Both analyze conversations with AI, and that's where the overlap ends. Chorus is ZoomInfo's sales conversation intelligence, built to tell revenue leaders how deals are progressing. Voxjar is quality assurance for every call your team takes, scored against your own criteria.
Read on for the straight comparison, no spin, before you sign anything.
The two can coexist. Chorus doesn't score individual calls against a rubric you control, so a company can keep Chorus for deal intelligence on the sales team while Voxjar handles QA and compliance across support and service. With usage-based pricing and unlimited users, adding Voxjar doesn't mean another seat count or another minimum.
Chorus was one of the original conversation intelligence platforms for B2B revenue teams, and ZoomInfo paid $575 million for it in 2021 because it's genuinely good at its job. It joins and records sales calls and video meetings via calendar integration, then surfaces moment detection (pricing mentions, competitors, next steps), rep scorecards built on talk ratios and discovery-question patterns, and competitive intelligence across deals. Its distinctive edge is the data: conversations get enriched with ZoomInfo's B2B contact and company intelligence, and everything flows back to the Salesforce or HubSpot opportunity record.
The acquisition also changed what buying Chorus means. It's now sold through ZoomInfo's enterprise motion, increasingly as part of larger platform bundles rather than as a standalone tool, which is the most common complaint from its own customers. And its scope is what it always was: sales. There are no configurable QA scorecards for support workflows, no automated compliance screening, no chat or email analysis, no real-time guidance during calls. Asking Chorus whether 2,000 support calls followed your required disclosure script last week is asking a deal-intelligence tool a QA question.
Voxjar exists to answer that question. It evaluates every voice and text conversation against scorecards you define, shows the reasoning behind every score, and turns failures into instant workflow triggers through universal webhooks: a Slack alert, a CRM update, a coaching task. It's model-agnostic (GPT, Claude, or Gemini, your choice) and self-serve from the first minute, no bundle attached.
Chorus doesn't publish pricing, and since the acquisition it's folded into ZoomInfo's enterprise sales process. Reported figures put the entry point near $8,000/year for a 3-seat minimum, with each additional seat around $1,200/year (roughly $100 per user per month) on a typical two-year contract, and enterprise implementations running about $10,000-$25,000. The bigger variable is the bundle: pairing Chorus with ZoomInfo's data platform can add $15,000-$40,000/year, and buyers consistently report being steered toward those packages rather than a standalone purchase. A free trial does exist, though it runs through the ZoomInfo sales motion rather than self-serve signup, and there's no free tier.
Voxjar prices the work, not the roster. Everything is out in the open: plans start at $99/month and grow only with the call volume you run through analysis. Every plan includes unlimited users, with no minimum seat count, no setup fee, and the option to bill month-to-month. A free tier is there when you want it, and you can score one of your own calls free before signing up for anything.
Per-seat economics with an $8,000 floor make sense for a handful of quota-carrying reps whose deals are worth six figures. They break immediately for a 40-agent support floor, where the whole point is that everyone, agents included, should see the scores. That's the structural reason these two products price the way they do, and the clearest signal of which one you're actually shopping for.
| Voxjar | Chorus.ai | |
|---|---|---|
| What it's built for | ||
| Primary job | QA every customer call | Deal intelligence for B2B sales |
| Primary buyer | QA & ops leaders | Sales managers / RevOps |
| Auto QA scorecards (your criteria) | ||
| Compliance screening | ||
| Deal & competitive intelligence | ||
| ZoomInfo contact & company data enrichment | ||
| Video meeting capture | ||
| Chat & text analysis | ||
| Real-time analysis | Batch or real-time | |
| Pricing | ||
| Published pricing | ||
| Starting price | $99/mo, free tier | ~$8k/yr, 3-seat minimum |
| Seat cost | Unlimited users, $0 | ~$1,200/user/yr |
| Implementation fee | None | ~$10k-$25k (enterprise) |
| ZoomInfo bundle pressure | None, standalone product | Bundles can add $15k-$40k/yr |
| Contract | Month-to-month or annual | Annual, typically 2 years |
| Getting started | ||
| Self-serve signup | Product-led setup, sales-led purchase | |
| Time to first scored call | Minutes | Weeks to months (enterprise setup) |
| Free AI evaluation of your own call | ||
| Choose your AI model (GPT, Claude, Gemini) | ||
| See the AI's reasoning on every score | ||
Chorus.ai pricing figures are reported buyer estimates; ZoomInfo does not publish Chorus pricing.
Only when the shopping list was wrong to begin with. If you looked at Chorus because you want AI insight into customer conversations at large, and the per-seat minimums, ZoomInfo bundling, or sales-only focus didn't fit, Voxjar is the better match: it scores 100% of calls against your own criteria with usage pricing and unlimited users. If you specifically want deal intelligence tied to ZoomInfo's B2B data, Chorus is the right category and Voxjar isn't.
Chorus doesn't publish pricing. Reported figures put the entry point near $8,000/year for a 3-seat minimum, with additional seats around $1,200/year (roughly $100/user/month) on a typical two-year contract, and enterprise implementations around $10,000-$25,000. Bundling with the ZoomInfo data platform can add $15,000-$40,000/year. Voxjar publishes its pricing: plans start at $99/month with unlimited users, no minimums, no setup fee, and a free tier.
ZoomInfo acquired Chorus in 2021 for $575 million, and Chorus is now sold as part of the ZoomInfo platform. Existing ZoomInfo customers get a well-integrated add-on that enriches conversations with contact and company data. Buyers who only want conversation analysis report being pushed toward larger ZoomInfo packages, with standalone flexibility and pricing clarity eroding as a result. Voxjar is standalone by design: one product, one published price.
No, and it doesn't claim to. Chorus is built for B2B sales teams: it lacks configurable QA scorecards for support workflows, automated compliance screening, and the per-interaction economics that high-volume service operations need. It also covers voice and video only, with no chat or email analysis. Contact-center QA is exactly the job Voxjar was built for.
Yes. Some teams keep Chorus for deal intelligence on the sales side and add Voxjar to score support, service, and sales calls against a rubric they control, with compliance screening included. Because Voxjar is usage-based with unlimited users, layering it on doesn't mean a second set of seat licenses or another minimum.
Yes. Hand Voxjar one of your own recordings, or pick a sample call, and within minutes you'll have a complete scored evaluation with the AI's reasoning attached, and no demo, sales call, credit card, or contract along the way. Chorus is sold through ZoomInfo's enterprise sales motion on annual contracts, typically two years.
Get 120 AI Credits and Full Access
